RonAmok!

Asset based Marketing & Public Relations

John Wall over at Ronin Marketeer has struck a nerve with his most recent post entitled Screw Your Customers. The gist is that as a loyal customer, he went to his cell phone company to get an advertised rate, only to find out that he was ineligible. Why? Because he had the unfortunate situation of BEING A SPRINT CUSTOMER! If he wasn’t a customer, though, they gladly would have offered him the deal.

John seems to have struck a nerve, as the comments to his blog have been growing steadily. And I’m perfectly happy to add fuel to the fire, because this is an example of what I’ve been talking about with regards to R/W Marketing. John is using his readership as a way to shoot back. Since this topic is a hot one for me, I’ll just follow his tracers with my own fire.

Last year I made a decision. I was not going to get rolled into another two-year contract with Verizon Wireless, no matter what they offered as perks. I’ve been a faithful Verizon customer for almost eight years. How did I end up staying with them, you may ask? Because I’m a stooge. Every time I made some sort of modification to my plan, like adding a service or adding a phone for one of my kids, I blindly followed Verizon’s policy to keep adding another two year commitment onto my existing contract.

Last December I said, “No mas.”

I had bought a new car with Bluetooth capabilities built into it. My cell phone at the time didn’t support Bluetooth, so I went to the Verizon store to upgrade. I found a phone for $99 — well that was the large-font-price. The small-font-price said $299. Everything went well until the sales rep tried to ring me up and said, “Oh, sir. You still have a year left on your contract, so you can’t get the upgrade price on this phone.”

“I can’t?”

“But, I tell you what. I can get you a prorated discount, would that be okay?”

“You mean instead of charging me $99 for the $299 phone, you’re going to charge me like $199?

“Exactly,” he said, somewhat pleased with my ability to do simple math.

“Okay, I can live with that.”

“Excellent. Now all you need to do is sign here, and extend your contract with us for two more years.”

“For what?”

“For getting the prorated discount.”

My demeanor changed instantaneously. “No thank you.”

“Excuse me?”

“No thank you. I don’t want the discount,” I said.

“You wanna pay $299 for a phone when you only need to pay $199?”

“Yup.”

The rep looked at me, incredulously — blinked a few times — then tried to enter my request into his computer. He couldn’t figure out how to do it. “I need to speak with a manager,” he said, walking off to some corner of the store.

The rep came back with the sales manager in tow.

“What seems to be the problem?” the manager asked.

“No problem,” I said. “I just wanna buy this phone.”

“But you don’t want the discount?”

“I’d love the discount. But the cost for the discount is too high.”

“But there is no cost. You just need to extend your contract.”

“And I’m not willing to do that.”

“Why not?”

He knew exactly why. He knew that extending the contract was a sucker’s bet…especially if at the end of the year I was a free agent and could shop around and get the deal John Wall couldn’t.

“It really doesn’t matter, does it?” I said firmly.

He shook his head, helped the rep find the appropriate keystrokes, and sold me my Bluetooth-enabled phone for full price.

To tell you the truth, I’ve never felt happier to pay retail for anything.

Filed under: Miscellaneous

Nov 25, 2007

I was having a spirited debate with my VP of Marketing about a month ago. His premise and conclusion amounted to the following — that throughout the history of the world, the role of Marketing has never changed. It has seen technologies come and go, and yet its mission has never changed — to deliver messages to the marketplace.

His argument didn’t settle too well with me, because Social Media adds some new wrinkles into the traditional marketing role. The difference is that the Read/Write Web has armed the recipients with a power to react, to put their own spin on, and the ability to CHANGE the message — AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT!

In the past, marketeers would “target” passive markets and shoot messages at them. Today, those targets aren’t passive. Armed with the Read/Write web, they have the ability to shoot back.

Therefore, not only must your marketing department create, deliver and measure the results of its messages, but the New Marketeer must monitor and react to the morphing of those messages. Such reactions may take the form of better messaging, feedback to R&D, or ideas for whole new product lines that your company never could have conceived in the first place.

Tags:

Filed under: Social Media

Although video is easier to produce than audio, video causes all sorts of problems for companies. If your company is thinking of adopting video as a communications medium, here are some technical things to consider.

Fie size. Video files are big. It’s common to have a 320×240 pixel 5 minute MP4-encoded video that is 20MB in size. And I bet that your IT department really hasn’t thought through the infrastructure required for employees to start stuffing 20-100M files into the system.

It is highly likely that your corporate infrastructure is build for text-based databases and email, thus has no capacity to be sending large video files around the company. You have two options:

1) Don’t tell your corporate IT folks; post the video, and see what happens

2) Call your IT department and have them tell you “No.”

Although dealing with the “accommodating” and “pleasant” nature of the traditional IT department, I recommend option #2 for the following reason: You are making a request to an internal service provider. If they say “No,” then you have every right to ask “when” they’ll be able to service your request. In the mean time, you can use an external hosting provider.

But even an external hosting provider won’t help you with another problem…moving large video files behind your company’s firewall.

One of the first problems that you’ll have with video is figuring how to get rendered files from Point-A to Point-B. For example, lets say that your colleague in another office has created a video for you to post externally. They aren’t video-savvy, so they have an uncompressed AVI file for you..which is about 1GB in size — too big to even fit on a CD-ROM.

By their very nature, video files are large, but they don’t need to be unnecessarily large. Therefore, I recommend creating a set of corporate guidelines for rendered video. If video content is produced using these guidelines, you’ll at least have the best quality video at the smallest file size.

Of all the options, let’s just focus on three…which will produce the smallest file with the best video quality: Video Encoding Format, Video Bitrate, and Audio Encoding Parameters.

  • Video Encoding Format
    • MP4, MPEG4 (DivX, Xvid, etc).
  • Bitrate:
    • Choose a “bitrate” of somewhere between 700kbps and 1000kbps. The lower the number, the lower the quality and the file size. The higher the number, the higher the quality and file size. There is no magic bullet here…you may have to experiment.
  • Audio: The goal of audio is to think about where the video is going to be viewed. It is likely that it will be on a screen, with teeny tiny loudspeakers, or less likely, on a portable device with ear buds. Either one does not need theatrical-quality sound, and therefore, we can trade-off quality (that would essentially be wasted) for a reduction in file size.
    • Use the MP3 or AAC audio codec (Continuous bit rate…aka: CBR)
    • Sample Rate 22KHz
    • Bit Rate: 22Kbps
    • Mode: Mono

But even with proper encoding on the producer’s end, the file size will still be too big to attach to an email. Here is where an IT department can help. See if they can setup a a centralized area where people can drag and drop files. The benefit to the IT folks is twofold: you are helping them keep the email servers from being overwhelmed, and they’ll also have an opportunity to monitor how much video is being produced. Such information is valueable as they put together their future hardware/software/service-provider plans.

Video is a very powerful way for the new Marketing Department to present information. But it comes with some technical issues that must be dealt with. My next posting will give you some things to think about when choosing an external hosting company.

Filed under: Content Development