RonAmok!

Last week I accomplished a major milestone: I released the final audio chapter of Read This First, making the entire audio book available free for download. During the past year, many people have asked me why I did this, assuming that by releasing an audio book for free, hard copy sales would suffer. ”Why would anyone buy a paper-based book if the audio of it is available for free?” they ask frequently.

“Because it’s my business strategy,” I answer — a strategy that I’d like to share with you today.

Competing in a Crowded Marketplace

When I started writing Read This First in the fall of 2008, the concept of “social media” was finding its way into the cultural lexicon. Instead of raising their eyebrows whenever I explained what I do for a living, normal people (those not in the social media fishbowl) began asking thoughtful questions. Throughout 2009, their curiosity grew as more and more businesses added social mediums into their communications plans.

When my book was released in November 2009, not only were bookstore shelves packed with new books on the subject, but an endless stream of social media consultants began hanging shingles on their virtual front doors. It didn’t take me too long to see Read This First as an opportunity to distinguish myself from something that my good friend Rob Shore calls, “a sea of sameness.”

What Business Are You In?

Many years ago I read What they Don’t Teach you in Harvard Business School by Mark McCormick. In it, he told a story about someone who asked Andre Heiniger, the Chairman of Rolex, for an assessment of the watch business.”

Heiniger replied that he had no idea about the watch business because Rolex was in the luxury business.

The story has helped guide many of my business decisions. So, while assessing my strengths and weaknesses in this rapidly crowding competitive landscape, I found myself asking, “What business am I in?”

I looked at the problem from a customer risk perspective. If someone wanted to mitigate the financial risk of buying my book, what did I have to offer them? Chris Anderson’s book Free convinced me to record and release a costless audio version of the book– a decision based on my faith in the marketplace. I figured that:

• if the book was good, people would listen.
• if someone didn’t want to invest the 5 hours required to listen to the entire book, they had an option to purchase a hard copy of it.
• if someone liked the audio book, they could either refer it to a friend or purchase a hard copy for them.
• and if they liked my business perspective on new/social media, they could hire me as a consultant or a speaker.

So, how is it working? Since I’ve I released the book:

• a professor at a college in Tennessee has made Read This First required reading for one of his PR classes.
• A consultant in Australia gives copies of the book to his social media seminar attendees.
• Weekly, I receive emails, tweets, and DMs, thanking me for letting them sample the book. Many tell me how they’ve since purchased multiple copies of the book for co-workers or senior management.
• And most importantly, both audio downloads and book sales have generated solid leads that I’ve converted into both consulting and paid speaking engagements.

So, What Business am I in?

I’m in the business of sharing my perspective with as many people as possible. Some people will prefer just to sample my perspective. Others will choose to pay for a customized version of that perspective. Either way, I’ve learned that the more people I have in each category, the healthier my business.

So, what business are you in?

This morning, Chris Brogan published a blog post where he revealed that his new joint venture, Third Tribe Marketing has added 2000 subscribers since its launch last month. At $47 per month per subscriber, that’s an annualized revenue stream of $1.128 million.

As an executive, think about this for a minute. Here is a brand new venture that flipped a switch and opened a revenue stream of $1.128 million–instantly. Add the fact that it did so without spending a dime on traditional marketing or advertising and we have an interesting case study for our theory that Audience is an Asset.

Over the past five years, Chris has built an audience that consists of 47,000 blog subscribers, 125,00 Twitter followers, TBD Web visitors, and TBD email newsletter subscribers.  By asking it to participate in Third Tribe Marketing, this aggregated audience responded by producing 2000 subscribers paying $47 per month.

Put another way, Chris has built a financial asset that can distribute a $1.128 million annual dividend. Therefore, if we use a multiple of 10 times earnings, can we assume his audience is worth $11.28 million? Not even close. It’s worth much more because this audience pays more than one dividend.

Consider Trust Agents, the book that he co-authored with Julien Smith, that rumbled its way to the New York Times Best Seller List simply because he asked his audience to buy it? Or what about the business and speaking revenue his asset generates for his company New Marketing Labs? By adding up all of these revenue sources and multiplying the result by whatever multiple you’re comfortable with, we can calculate a real and tangible financial value for an online audience.

The value of your social media investments is calculated through the dividends your audience asset can distribute to you.

And for those fixated on ROI justifications:

Assuming that Chris worked 80 hours per week for five years creating valuable content (a number that I believe is conservative), he invested 20,000 Brogan hours into building this asset. Does the investment justify the return? I think so.

Photo Credit: C.C. Chapman

For the past few months, I’ve been seeking alternative ways to quantify the value of Social Media through studying the financial statements of publicly traded media companies. I found something interesting while looking at the FY2009 balance sheet of  Media General, Inc. One of its line items,  FCC licenses and other intangibles – net, lost 66% of its value in just two years! That’s $426 million! Gone! But where did it go?

Here’s how the item is described in the report:

FCC broadcast licenses are granted for maximum terms of eight years and are subject to renewal upon application to the FCC. The terms of several of the Company’s FCC licenses have expired, however the licenses remain in effect until action on the renewal applications has been completed. The Company filed all of its applications for renewal in a timely manner prior to the applicable expiration dates and expects its applications will be approved as the FCC works through its backlog. The Company’s network affiliation agreement intangible assets are due for renewal in a weighted-average period of three years. The Company currently expects that it will renew each network affiliation agreement prior to its expiration date. Costs associated with renewing or extending intangible assets are insignificant and are expensed as incurred.

Let’s think about this for a minute. Media General is a company that owns 18 television stations, 21 daily newspapers, and publishes over 200 specialty publications. It’s broadcast business unit is required to purchase licenses from the Federal Communications Commission in order to transmit programming. FCC licenses are scarce resources, meaning that if Media General owns one, its competitors can’t, creating a competitive advantage that Media General has assigned a real financial value to through its balance sheet.

Compare and contrast Media General’s broadcast business with those of us who publish content online. We have no such restrictions. We don’t need to purchase FCC licenses and therefore are not subject to their trappings, such language restrictions, geographic limitations, public service announcements, and bidding wars that translate into hefty operating costs. Add the cost of broadcast equipment and radio towers, and we, the digital content producers, have a huge competitive advantage over traditional broadcast companies just by comparing our respective distribution costs.

Historically, traditional media companies have made their money by investing in two things: building their audiences and owning the distribution channels to those audiences. In the past, the combined value of these pieces was large enough to sustain a profit through renting access to them through advertising. Unfortunately, the value of today’s broadcast assets may have dropped to a point where the rent (advertising) won’t cover the mortgage (distribution costs) anymore.

And lastly, let’s revisit the question asked earlier: “Where did that $426 million go?” Did it just vaporize into thin air? Maybe not. I contend that its value was absorbed into the digital distribution channel, where it sits, waiting for smart companies to take advantage of it…companies that believe that Audience is an Asset.

Tags:Audience is an Asset Ron Ploof ronamok FCC licenses